Stephen Douglas believed in in style sovereignty, the precept that the residents of every territory ought to resolve the query of slavery for themselves by their territorial legislatures. This contrasted sharply with the positions of abolitionists, who sought a nationwide ban on slavery, and a few Southern Democrats who believed settlers had a constitutional proper to deliver enslaved individuals into the territories. Douglas argued that in style sovereignty finest embodied the American preferrred of self-government and was a sensible compromise to take care of nationwide unity within the face of rising sectional tensions.
This precept turned a central tenet of Douglas’s political profession and a key component of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. This act successfully repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had restricted the growth of slavery. The appliance of in style sovereignty in Kansas and Nebraska led to violent battle between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions, a interval often known as “Bleeding Kansas.” This battle underscored the constraints and inherent contradictions of in style sovereignty as an answer to the slavery challenge, and contributed considerably to the polarization that finally led to the Civil Conflict.
