Nonprofit organizations, in contrast to companies, will not be owned within the conventional sense. No particular person or group holds fairness or can revenue financially from the group’s actions. As an alternative, they’re ruled by a board of administrators or trustees who’ve a fiduciary duty to make sure the group fulfills its mission. For instance, a hospital operated as a nonprofit is overseen by a board, not shareholders, and any surplus income is reinvested to enhance providers or increase its attain.
This construction is important for sustaining public belief and guaranteeing the group’s sources are devoted to its acknowledged goal. The absence of personal possession permits nonprofits to concentrate on serving the general public good, whether or not by means of charitable work, scientific analysis, or instructional initiatives. Traditionally, this mannequin emerged to deal with societal wants past the scope of presidency or for-profit entities, creating an area for organizations devoted solely to particular missions.
Understanding this elementary precept of nonprofit governance is essential for efficient oversight, clear operations, and sustainable influence. The next sections will additional discover the roles and tasks of boards, the authorized framework governing nonprofits, and the varied organizational constructions inside the sector.
1. No possession in conventional sense
The phrase “no possession within the conventional sense” is central to understanding how nonprofit organizations perform. Not like companies with house owners or shareholders who maintain fairness and profit financially, nonprofits will not be owned by any particular person or group. This distinction has important authorized and sensible implications. The absence of conventional possession ensures that the group’s sources are devoted solely to its mission, reasonably than distributed as revenue. For instance, a nonprofit animal shelter can’t be offered for personal achieve; its property should proceed serving its mission of animal welfare. This construction reinforces public belief and accountability, essential parts for organizations reliant on donations and grants.
This distinctive construction distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities in elementary methods. Whereas a for-profit enterprise prioritizes maximizing shareholder worth, a nonprofit prioritizes mission achievement. Contemplate a museum operated as a nonprofit. Any surplus income generated by means of ticket gross sales or donations is reinvested in preserving artifacts, growing instructional applications, or increasing entry. Conversely, a for-profit museum would distribute earnings to its house owners. Understanding this distinction is essential for assessing a corporation’s operational priorities and monetary choices.
In conclusion, the absence of conventional possession defines the nonprofit sector, guaranteeing its sources serve the general public good. This construction, whereas generally advanced, ensures accountability and fosters public belief, enabling nonprofits to deal with essential societal wants. The implications of this mannequin lengthen past monetary concerns, shaping governance, strategic planning, and general organizational effectiveness. Navigating the authorized and regulatory panorama surrounding nonprofit possession is important for guaranteeing these organizations function ethically and sustainably.
2. Public Belief
Public belief is paramount for nonprofit organizations. Their non-ownership mannequin, distinguishing them from for-profit entities, necessitates demonstrating accountable useful resource administration and unwavering dedication to mission achievement. This belief underpins their means to safe funding, entice volunteers, and keep legitimacy inside the communities they serve. Incomes and sustaining public belief is subsequently not merely a fascinating final result however a elementary operational requirement.
-
Transparency and Accountability
Transparency in monetary practices and governance is essential for constructing public belief. Nonprofits should brazenly talk how sources are allotted and reveal measurable influence. Recurrently publishing monetary experiences, disclosing board member affiliations, and present process unbiased audits reveal a dedication to accountability. For example, a nonprofit environmental group detailing its expenditures on conservation tasks and administrative overhead fosters belief with donors. With out such transparency, suspicions of mismanagement can erode public confidence.
-
Mission Alignment
Constant alignment of actions with the acknowledged mission is important. Deviation from the mission can injury public belief, particularly when donors really feel their contributions are misused. A nonprofit devoted to supporting arts schooling should demonstrably prioritize applications that instantly profit college students and artists. Diverting funds in the direction of unrelated ventures, even when well-intentioned, can undermine public confidence and jeopardize future assist.
-
Moral Conduct
Moral conduct by board members, employees, and volunteers is key. Cases of battle of curiosity, monetary impropriety, or discrimination can severely injury a corporation’s status and erode public belief. A nonprofit centered on poverty alleviation should guarantee its inner practices replicate its dedication to social justice. Failing to uphold moral requirements can result in authorized repercussions, lack of funding, and diminished public assist.
-
Responsiveness to Neighborhood Wants
Demonstrating responsiveness to group wants reinforces public belief. Actively participating with the communities served, soliciting suggestions, and adapting applications primarily based on evolving wants strengthens the group’s relevance and influence. A nonprofit offering catastrophe reduction should prioritize probably the most pressing and impactful assist primarily based on direct group enter. Ignoring group suggestions undermines belief and may result in ineffective useful resource allocation.
These sides of public belief underscore the distinctive place of nonprofit organizations. The absence of personal possession necessitates a heightened concentrate on accountability, transparency, and moral conduct. Sustaining public belief will not be merely a matter of excellent follow however a situation for survival and sustained effectiveness in fulfilling the group’s mission. Failing to prioritize these parts can jeopardize a corporation’s means to safe funding, entice expertise, and finally, obtain its supposed influence.
3. Mission-driven
The mission-driven nature of nonprofit organizations is intrinsically linked to their lack of conventional possession. As a result of no particular person or group earnings financially from a nonprofit’s success, the group’s mission turns into its driving pressure. This mission, usually articulated in a proper assertion of goal, guides all organizational actions, from strategic planning and useful resource allocation to program growth and analysis. This focus distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities the place revenue maximization usually takes priority. For example, a nonprofit devoted to environmental conservation will prioritize defending endangered species even when these efforts don’t generate income, whereas a for-profit firm would possibly prioritize worthwhile ventures even when they’ve detrimental environmental penalties. The mission acts because the organizational “proprietor,” shaping choices and guaranteeing sources serve the supposed goal.
The absence of conventional possession necessitates a powerful, clearly outlined mission to information decision-making. This mission supplies a framework for accountability, guaranteeing that actions align with the group’s acknowledged goal. Contemplate a nonprofit centered on offering instructional alternatives for underprivileged youth. Its mission dictates how funds are allotted, which applications are developed, and the way success is measured. The mission serves as a benchmark in opposition to which efficiency is evaluated, guaranteeing the group stays true to its core goal. With no clearly outlined and persistently utilized mission, a nonprofit dangers shedding focus and probably diverting sources away from its supposed beneficiaries. This underscores the very important function of the mission in offering path and sustaining organizational integrity inside the nonprofit sector. Sensible purposes of a mission-driven strategy can embody prioritizing group wants over potential income streams, refusing funding sources that battle with organizational values, and persistently evaluating applications primarily based on their influence on the goal inhabitants.
In abstract, the mission of a nonprofit group serves as its tenet, an alternative to conventional possession. It supplies path, ensures accountability, and maintains concentrate on the supposed beneficiaries. Understanding this important hyperlink between mission and the non-ownership construction is important for efficient governance, strategic planning, and general organizational success inside the nonprofit sector. Challenges can come up when missions change into outdated or when inner conflicts come up relating to interpretation of the mission. Recurrently reviewing and reaffirming the mission, coupled with clear inner communication, are essential for navigating these challenges and guaranteeing the group stays true to its goal. This reinforces the essential function of the mission because the driving pressure behind all nonprofit actions.
4. Board of Administrators/Trustees
The board of administrators or trustees performs a vital function within the context of nonprofit possession, serving because the governing physique accountable for the group’s general well-being and adherence to its mission. Whereas nonprofits lack conventional house owners, the board fulfills an identical perform, guaranteeing the group operates within the public curiosity and fulfills its supposed goal. Understanding the board’s function is important for comprehending the distinctive possession construction of nonprofits.
-
Fiduciary Responsibility
Board members bear a fiduciary responsibility to the group, encompassing the duties of care, loyalty, and obedience. This authorized and moral obligation requires them to behave in the most effective pursuits of the group, prioritizing its mission above private achieve. For instance, board members should train due diligence when making monetary choices, guaranteeing accountable useful resource allocation aligned with the group’s goal. Failing to uphold this responsibility can result in authorized repercussions and injury the group’s status.
-
Strategic Oversight
The board supplies strategic oversight, setting the group’s general path and guaranteeing its long-term sustainability. This consists of approving strategic plans, monitoring program effectiveness, and overseeing monetary efficiency. For instance, a board would possibly approve a brand new fundraising technique to make sure the group’s monetary stability or consider the influence of a particular program to find out its effectiveness in attaining the group’s mission. This strategic steerage is essential for navigating challenges and guaranteeing the group stays aligned with its core goal.
-
Monetary Stewardship
The board holds final duty for the group’s monetary well being. This consists of approving budgets, overseeing monetary audits, and guaranteeing accountable useful resource administration. For example, the board should guarantee enough monetary controls are in place to forestall fraud and guarantee compliance with related rules. This monetary stewardship is important for sustaining public belief and guaranteeing the group can successfully pursue its mission.
-
Accountability and Transparency
The board performs a essential function in guaranteeing organizational accountability and transparency. This consists of establishing clear governance insurance policies, usually speaking with stakeholders, and demonstrating measurable influence. For instance, a board would possibly publish an annual report detailing the group’s achievements and monetary efficiency or set up a whistleblower coverage to encourage reporting of moral violations. This dedication to accountability and transparency reinforces public belief and demonstrates accountable governance.
These sides reveal how the board of administrators or trustees successfully “owns” the nonprofit group by guaranteeing its accountable operation and adherence to its mission. Whereas missing the monetary possession attribute of for-profit entities, the board’s stewardship and oversight fulfill a comparable function, guaranteeing the group serves the general public good and stays true to its goal. This clarifies the essential connection between board governance and the distinctive possession construction defining the nonprofit sector.
5. Stewardship, not possession
The idea of “stewardship, not possession” is key to understanding the construction and operation of nonprofit organizations. It addresses the query of “who owns a non revenue” by clarifying that these organizations will not be owned within the conventional sense, however reasonably entrusted to people and teams who’ve a duty to handle them ethically and successfully in pursuit of their mission. This precept distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities, highlighting the general public belief inherent of their operations.
-
Accountability and Accountability
Stewardship emphasizes duty and accountability for the group’s sources and mission. Not like house owners who can revenue from a corporation’s success, stewards are entrusted with defending and using property for the general public good. For instance, a board member of a nonprofit hospital is accountable for guaranteeing sources are used to offer high quality healthcare, not for private achieve. This accountability ensures that the group stays centered on its mission and serves its supposed beneficiaries.
-
Lengthy-Time period Perspective
Stewardship implies a long-term perspective, specializing in the group’s enduring goal and sustainability. Selections are made not for short-term features however for the lasting influence on the communities served. For example, a nonprofit devoted to preserving historic landmarks makes choices primarily based on the long-term preservation of these websites, not on quick monetary returns. This long-term imaginative and prescient ensures the group’s continued relevance and influence.
-
Neighborhood Profit
Stewardship prioritizes the good thing about the group served by the nonprofit. Assets are managed and deployed with the intention of maximizing constructive influence and addressing group wants. For instance, a nonprofit offering instructional applications focuses on serving college students successfully, not on producing income. This community-centric strategy distinguishes nonprofits and reinforces their function in addressing societal challenges.
-
Transparency and Belief
Stewardship promotes transparency and fosters public belief. Open communication about how sources are managed and the influence achieved builds confidence and strengthens relationships with stakeholders. A nonprofit environmental group that publishes detailed experiences on its conservation efforts demonstrates transparency, fostering belief with donors and the broader group.
These sides of stewardship spotlight the distinctive nature of nonprofit “possession.” The absence of conventional house owners necessitates a heightened concentrate on duty, accountability, and the long-term well-being of the group and the group it serves. This stewardship mannequin underscores the general public belief inherent within the nonprofit sector and distinguishes it from the profit-driven motives of the non-public sector. Understanding “stewardship, not possession” is essential for guaranteeing the moral and efficient operation of nonprofit organizations and their continued contribution to society.
6. Accountable to the Public
Accountability to the general public is a defining attribute of nonprofit organizations, instantly stemming from the absence of personal possession. This accountability shapes operational practices, governance constructions, and the general relationship between the nonprofit and the group it serves. As a result of no particular person or group holds fairness or earnings from the group’s actions, the general public turns into the last word beneficiary, holding the group accountable for its actions and the accountable use of its sources. This dynamic kinds the core of what it means to “personal” a nonprofit stewardship on behalf of the general public good.
This public accountability manifests in a number of essential methods. Monetary transparency, by means of public disclosure of monetary statements and unbiased audits, is important. Nonprofits should reveal how donated funds and different sources are utilized to attain their mission. Programmatic accountability requires demonstrating effectiveness and influence, exhibiting tangible outcomes that justify public belief and continued assist. For instance, a nonprofit centered on literacy should reveal improved studying abilities amongst its beneficiaries. Governance accountability calls for moral conduct and accountable decision-making by the board of administrators, guaranteeing alignment with the mission and avoidance of conflicts of curiosity. A hospital working as a nonprofit should guarantee its board prioritizes affected person care over potential monetary features. These practices make sure the group stays true to its goal and serves the general public good, fulfilling the core precept of nonprofit “possession.”
Understanding the connection between public accountability and the non-ownership construction of nonprofits is essential for sustaining belief, guaranteeing efficient useful resource allocation, and maximizing constructive influence. Challenges can come up when balancing accountability with operational effectivity and fundraising calls for. Nonetheless, prioritizing transparency and demonstrating measurable influence strengthens public confidence and reinforces the legitimacy of the nonprofit sector. This accountability distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities, highlighting their distinctive function in addressing societal wants and serving the general public good, thereby fulfilling the essence of “possession” inside the nonprofit context.
7. Reinvested surplus
Reinvested surplus is a key idea in understanding the non-ownership mannequin of nonprofit organizations. It instantly addresses the query of “who owns a non revenue” by highlighting how monetary sources are utilized. Not like for-profit entities the place earnings are distributed to house owners or shareholders, any surplus generated by a nonprofit is reinvested again into the group to additional its mission. This follow underscores the general public belief inherent in nonprofit operations and distinguishes them from profit-driven enterprises.
-
Mission Development
Surplus funds are primarily reinvested to advance the group’s mission. This would possibly contain increasing current applications, growing new initiatives, or investing in infrastructure and sources to boost operational effectiveness. For example, a nonprofit animal shelter would possibly use surplus funds to construct a brand new adoption heart or increase its veterinary providers. This reinvestment instantly contributes to fulfilling the group’s core goal and maximizing its influence.
-
Sustainability and Development
Reinvested surplus contributes to the long-term sustainability and development of the group. By strengthening monetary reserves, nonprofits can climate financial downturns, adapt to altering group wants, and pursue progressive options to deal with societal challenges. A nonprofit centered on environmental conservation would possibly make investments surplus funds in an endowment to make sure long-term monetary stability and assist future conservation efforts. This monetary prudence safeguards the group’s means to satisfy its mission over time.
-
Enhanced Providers and Applications
Reinvesting surplus permits nonprofits to boost current providers and applications, bettering high quality, increasing attain, and rising influence. A nonprofit offering instructional providers would possibly use surplus funds to rent further employees, buy new gear, or develop progressive curriculum. This reinvestment instantly advantages the communities served by strengthening the group’s capability and bettering service supply.
-
Public Belief and Accountability
The follow of reinvesting surplus reinforces public belief and demonstrates accountability. By demonstrating that monetary sources are devoted solely to the mission, nonprofits construct confidence amongst donors and the broader group. A nonprofit arts group that reinvests surplus funds in group outreach applications demonstrates its dedication to accessibility and public engagement, thereby strengthening public belief.
These sides of reinvested surplus spotlight the distinctive monetary construction of nonprofit organizations and underscore the absence of personal possession. By reinvesting any surplus again into the group, nonprofits reveal their dedication to mission achievement and public profit, successfully answering the query of “who owns a non revenue” the general public, by means of the stewardship of the group and its board. This reinvestment cycle ensures the group’s long-term sustainability, enhances its means to serve the group, and reinforces the general public belief important for its continued operation and influence.
8. No non-public achieve
The precept of “no non-public achieve” is foundational to understanding the possession construction of nonprofit organizations. It instantly addresses the query of “who owns a non revenue” by clarifying that these organizations exist to serve a public goal, to not enrich people or non-public pursuits. This core tenet distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities and shapes their authorized framework, operational practices, and relationship with the general public.
-
Distribution of Property
The “no non-public achieve” precept dictates that property of a nonprofit can’t be distributed to people or non-public entities. Upon dissolution, remaining property should be transferred to a different nonprofit with an identical mission. This prevents people from taking advantage of the group’s closure and ensures sources proceed serving the general public good. For instance, if a nonprofit supporting arts schooling had been to dissolve, its remaining funds couldn’t be distributed to board members; they’d must be transferred to a different group selling arts schooling or a associated discipline. This safeguards in opposition to misuse of public belief and reinforces the group’s dedication to its mission past its operational lifespan.
-
Compensation and Advantages
Whereas nonprofit workers obtain salaries and advantages, compensation should be cheap and aligned with business requirements. Exorbitant salaries or lavish advantages for executives would violate the “no non-public achieve” precept, elevating considerations about potential misuse of funds. Transparency in compensation practices is essential for sustaining public belief and demonstrating accountability. A nonprofit hospital paying its CEO an unreasonably excessive wage relative to comparable establishments raises pink flags about potential conflicts of curiosity and deviation from the mission of offering reasonably priced healthcare. This emphasizes the significance of cheap compensation practices inside the nonprofit sector.
-
Conflicts of Curiosity
The “no non-public achieve” precept necessitates stringent insurance policies to forestall conflicts of curiosity. Board members and employees should keep away from conditions the place private pursuits might affect organizational choices. For instance, a board member of a nonprofit granting group shouldn’t take part in choices relating to grants to organizations through which they’ve a monetary stake. This safeguards in opposition to self-dealing and ensures choices are made solely in the most effective pursuits of the group and its mission. Sturdy battle of curiosity insurance policies are important for sustaining moral conduct and public belief inside the nonprofit sector.
-
Fundraising and Income Era
Even when participating in revenue-generating actions, nonprofits should adhere to the “no non-public achieve” precept. Income generated should be used to assist the mission, to not enrich people. A nonprofit museum charging admission charges should use that income to keep up displays, develop instructional applications, or improve accessibility, to not distribute earnings to people related to the museum. This reinforces the excellence between nonprofit and for-profit entities and emphasizes the significance of aligning all actions with the group’s mission.
These sides of “no non-public achieve” underscore the core distinction between nonprofit and for-profit organizations, offering a framework for understanding “who owns a non revenue.” The absence of personal possession creates a heightened duty to make sure all sources serve the general public good, reinforcing the general public belief important for the sector’s continued legitimacy and effectiveness. This precept shapes governance, operational practices, and monetary administration inside the nonprofit sector, guaranteeing these organizations stay true to their mission and serve the communities they’re supposed to learn.
9. Guided by mission
The phrase “guided by mission” encapsulates the essence of nonprofit possession. As a result of no particular person or group holds fairness or earnings from a nonprofit’s actions, the mission assertion serves because the group’s North Star, guiding all choices and actions. This precept instantly addresses the query of “who owns a non revenue” the mission itself, representing the general public curiosity and the supposed beneficiaries, successfully acts because the proprietor. This mission-driven strategy distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities the place monetary achieve usually takes priority.
The mission’s guiding affect manifests in varied methods. Strategic planning revolves round fulfilling the mission’s targets. Useful resource allocation prioritizes applications and initiatives instantly aligned with the mission. Analysis measures success primarily based on the mission’s achievement. For instance, a nonprofit devoted to offering clear water in growing nations will allocate sources in the direction of well-drilling tasks and water purification initiatives, guided by its mission to enhance public well being. Conversely, a for-profit firm would possibly prioritize extra worthwhile ventures, even when they don’t instantly tackle essential societal wants. This elementary distinction highlights the significance of “guided by mission” as a core element of nonprofit possession.
Understanding the centrality of mission to nonprofit governance is essential for guaranteeing accountability, transparency, and efficient useful resource allocation. Challenges can come up when mission statements change into outdated or lack specificity, resulting in ambiguity in decision-making. Recurrently reviewing and refining the mission, guaranteeing its relevance to evolving group wants and alignment with organizational values, strengthens its guiding affect and reinforces the group’s dedication to its core goal. This reinforces the idea of “guided by mission” as a sensible expression of possession inside the nonprofit sector, guaranteeing sources serve the general public good and the group stays true to its supposed beneficiaries.
Steadily Requested Questions About Nonprofit Possession
Addressing frequent inquiries relating to the possession construction of nonprofit organizations clarifies their distinctive function and operational rules.
Query 1: If nobody owns a nonprofit, who controls its property?
A board of administrators or trustees, performing as fiduciaries, controls the property and ensures their use aligns with the group’s mission. They’re accountable to the general public and authorized authorities.
Query 2: Can nonprofits generate income?
Nonprofits can generate income by means of varied actions, together with donations, grants, program charges, and investments. Crucially, any surplus income should be reinvested to additional the group’s mission, not distributed for personal achieve.
Query 3: What occurs to a nonprofit’s property if it dissolves?
Upon dissolution, remaining property should be transferred to a different nonprofit group with an identical mission, guaranteeing continued public profit.
Query 4: Are nonprofit workers volunteers?
Whereas volunteers usually contribute considerably, nonprofits usually make use of paid employees to handle operations and implement applications. Compensation should be cheap and aligned with business requirements, adhering to the precept of no non-public achieve.
Query 5: How are nonprofits accountable for his or her actions?
Nonprofits are accountable to the general public by means of varied mechanisms, together with monetary transparency, program analysis, unbiased audits, and adherence to authorized rules governing nonprofit operations.
Query 6: Can people profit financially from involvement with a nonprofit?
People can not revenue financially from a nonprofit’s success. Board members function volunteers or obtain nominal compensation, and employees obtain cheap salaries. Monetary achieve from the group’s actions is strictly prohibited, guaranteeing sources are devoted solely to the mission.
Understanding these elementary facets clarifies the distinctive nature of nonprofit possession, emphasizing mission-driven operation, public accountability, and the absence of personal monetary achieve.
For additional exploration, the next part delves deeper into particular examples of nonprofit constructions and their numerous roles inside the group.
Understanding Nonprofit Possession
Navigating the complexities of nonprofit governance requires a transparent understanding of their distinctive possession construction. The following pointers supply sensible steerage for these concerned with or interested by supporting nonprofit organizations.
Tip 1: Analysis the Group’s Mission: Completely look at the group’s mission assertion. This supplies essential perception into its core goal and the way sources are allotted. A clearly outlined mission ensures accountability and guides decision-making.
Tip 2: Assessment Monetary Reviews: Entry and analyze the group’s publicly obtainable monetary experiences, together with Kind 990s. This gives transparency into monetary well being, program expenditures, and administrative overhead, selling knowledgeable decision-making.
Tip 3: Perceive Board Governance: Analysis the composition and tasks of the board of administrators or trustees. Understanding their function in overseeing the group’s operations is important for assessing accountability and strategic path.
Tip 4: Consider Program Effectiveness: Search for proof of program effectiveness and measurable influence. Nonprofits ought to reveal how their actions obtain acknowledged objectives and contribute to the supposed public profit. This ensures sources are utilized successfully.
Tip 5: Acknowledge the Significance of Reinvestment: Keep in mind that surplus income is reinvested to additional the mission, not distributed for personal achieve. This distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities and ensures sources are devoted to the group’s goal.
Tip 6: Help Organizations Aligned with Values: Align philanthropic assist with private values and search organizations demonstrating robust governance, transparency, and impactful applications. This ensures contributions successfully assist causes aligned with particular person priorities.
Tip 7: Inquire About Battle of Curiosity Insurance policies: Ask in regards to the group’s battle of curiosity insurance policies and the way they’re enforced. This demonstrates a dedication to moral governance and accountable useful resource administration.
By understanding these key facets of nonprofit possession, people could make knowledgeable choices about supporting and fascinating with these very important organizations, contributing to their effectiveness and sustained influence on the group.
The next conclusion summarizes the important thing takeaways relating to nonprofit possession and its implications for the sector’s continued contribution to society.
Who Owns a Non Revenue
Understanding “who owns a non revenue” requires shifting from conventional possession ideas to a framework of public belief and mission-driven stewardship. No particular person or group holds fairness or earnings financially. As an alternative, a board of administrators or trustees governs the group, guaranteeing adherence to its mission and accountable useful resource allocation. Surplus income is reinvested to additional the mission, not distributed for personal achieve. This construction distinguishes nonprofits from for-profit entities, emphasizing public accountability and dedication to the supposed beneficiaries.
The absence of conventional possession underscores the significance of strong governance, clear monetary practices, and demonstrable influence. Continued public assist depends on nonprofits upholding these rules, guaranteeing sources serve the supposed goal and contribute to the better good. Sustained vigilance and a dedication to moral conduct are essential for sustaining public belief and the continued effectiveness of the nonprofit sector in addressing essential societal wants.
